 |
 |
 |
 |
Extracts from DEFRA's paper: Food Security and the UK (Dec
2006)- Food security involves diversifying supply options. The UK is able
to source efficiently foods from a wide variety of stable countries, especially
from other EU countries.
- (Referring to World War Two): It is very
difficult to envisage a recurrence of such extreme circumstances.
- Food
security should not be confused with national security, which is a pure public
good. Food itself does not have public good characteristics.
- Poverty
and subsistence agriculture are root causes of national food insecurity.
National food security is hugely more relevant for developing countries than
the rich countries of western Europe.
- Trends in the self-sufficiency
ratio are a misleading indicator of underlying food security for the UK.
Nowadays, certainly, the UK is well-placed to secure international supplies in
times of shortage.
- A defensive, nationalist, protectionist view of
food security may also have diverted attention from the question of how the
trading system could be used to prevent short-term concerns of
disruption.
- The UK's membership of the EU itself suggests that if
domestic sourcing is assumed to be 'reliable', so should European sourcing.
Most UK food imports are indeed sourced from Europe.
- Imported produce
is reliant on shipping. air freight and ports. It is very difficult to envisage
in the current geopolitical climate any future conflicts or events which would
recreate the spatial circumstances of WW2, and if so, what the contingencies
might be, although there are some lessons from history.
- Since most UK
imports come from mainland Europe (and Ireland) within the framework of the
European Union and its Single Market, the probability of EU shipping routes
being severely disrupted appears extremely remote.
- For now we can say
that it is a question of risk management rather than self-sufficiency: it is
more efficient to manage risks directly rather than through the indirect means
of a drive for self-sufficiency.
- Self-sufficiency makes little sense
in today's world of inter-related international markets.
- But the
analysis in this paper suggests that there is little logic in having fixed
minimum targets for self-sufficiency.
- Arguments used after the war in
favour of high levels of self-sufficiency are no longer relevant.
-
Considered globally, the UK is, and has long been, 'food secure'.
- The
self-sufficiency ratio is a poor, even misleading, indicator of food security.
These conclusions suggest that a discourse centred on 'UK food
security' or 'UK self-sufficiency' is fundamentally misplaced and unbalanced.
The real issues extend beyond the UK, beyond agriculture, beyond food. |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |